Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Triangle Order Fulfillment Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Triangle Order Fulfillment - Case Study Example Triangle Order Fulfillment Analysis In June the total number of orders that was received was 280900. The total number of defected orders was 2227. Defects per opportunity can be calculated here by using the formulae DPU= number of defect/number of opportunities = 2227/280900 = 0.0004081 This value is small indicating that the defects level is average. However the next month see the company having a DPU of 0.0089. This is a very large increase showing us that the level of error per total number of orders has increased. In august, the DPU reduced with a small range from that of July to get 0.0085. After this the DPU has been increasing steadily to reach 0.009 in November six months after the first DPU is measured. The increase in the DPU over the years shows that there is an increase in the number of low quality work that is done by the staff. The DPMO of all the months can be calculated as DPMO= 1000000*DPU. The DPMO of the month of June is 1000000*0.000408 this gives us 408. The DPMO of the next month increase s to 8800 showing a significant increase over the two months. The DPMO of the following months has been on the increase increasing steadily to reach the 9000 mark. This value shows that if one million orders are taken then 9000 of they will have defects. Though this might seem a small number, the problem comes by the way that it has arisen from 480 to 9000. . This shows that there are some changes that have been seen over the past 6 months. The graph below shows the way that the DPU as well as the DPMO have been increasing over the past 6 months.... This shows us that there might been a change or a significant event occurred between June and July to cause the changes that occur in the change in the DPU. K sigma can also be calculated from the above data but the standard deviation has to be calculated first. From the data the SD= 567. K= tolerance/ (2*SD) this we get the K sigma to be 1000000/ (2*567) ewe get value 881. Therefore the value is high and shows that the quality rate is reducing every time. If these defects are to be reduced then six sigma should be adopted by the company. There are lots of benefits that come with the use of six sigma, one is the improvement in quality of the work that is done, six sigma also provides an opportunity for the removing of the causes of defects in the organization and to also make sure that variability is reduced. The quality management tools that are used by six sigma also provide a special infrastructure of the general work force and this in turn helps the management to know the experts in each specific fields. For Ms. Jackson to convince Mr. Nguyen of the importance of six sigma, she needs to get all the benefits of six sigma and list them to the manager. She also needs to do research on companies that have successfully used six sigma and how they have benefited from the six sigma method. She also needs to inform the manager, that even if the implementation of six sigma would cost the company, it will help in saving for the expenses that come due to low quality. For six sigma to be in fully implemented, the following roles have to be taken The executive leadership has to be taken. The CEO and the top members of the management are to be in this category Champions who have the responsibility of implementing the six sigma Master black these are identified

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Extradition within the United Kingdom Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4500 words

Extradition within the United Kingdom - Essay Example To extradite means to return a criminal suspect into his country of origin or in a country in which he is to face trial. Suspects have the right to waive extradition in that they may choose to wilfully go back to the country in which the charges are pending. In certain circumstances the country in which the suspect has fled to may opt not to extradite the individual if they feel that the warranty for prosecution is not valid enough. (UK Parliament, 2000) Since extradition is governed by international laws, then most countries have entered into treaties to determine how suspects may be treated. Some countries may opt not to extradite persons that have been charged with serious crimes. In other circumstances, some countries may be specific about the extradition of persons who have committed serious crimes. In other scenarios, certain countries may have very complicated procedures for extradition and this may eventually lead to legal hurdles for the country conducting the trial. Certain countries such as Canada may not allow extradition if it is found that the suspect is likely to face the death penalty. Usually between the United Kingdom and other states contain information about extraditable offenses, conditions to waive extradition, conditions of entry into the country and what could lead to termination of extradition. In the United Kingdom (or a... In other words, it also called the outgoing extradition. However, since the United Kingdom is a member of the European Community, then it must comply with rules and regulations that have been written down by this body. One such instrument is the European Arrest Warrant or the EAW. The latter scheme is a common extradition law that is supposed to apply to all member states of the EC. However, the latter is not an exclusive document that is supposed to be treated independently. Instead, countries are expected to enact national legislations through the use of the EAW. In fact, very few countries within the EU have enacted the EAW. (UK Parliament, 2003) There are varying ways in which countries have implemented the EAW; however, most of the common features include decisions on who is to carry out the extradition and what duration of time is necessary for the entire process. Usually, most countries in the EU expect that extradition should be conducted by a court of law rather than a particular individual such as a government minister. Additionally, countries require that extradition be done in a period that is less than sixty days. Summary of the Conditions for extradition in the UK The details of this act shall be examined below but before getting into the intricacies, it is imperative to look into some of the overall themes involved. In other words there are some minimum requirements that govern the process of extradition in the region. First of all, for extradition to the United Kingdom, the country under consideration must have entered into a treaty or a convention with the country involved. Besides this, the crime under consideration must be one that is covered by